Carcinoma intraductal de próstata concomitante y respuesta al tratamiento hormonal en el carcinoma de próstata metastásico / Concomitant intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and response to hormonal therapy in metastatic prostate carcinoma

Introducción y objetivo: La mayoría de los cánceres de próstata (CP) se clasifican como adenocarcinoma acinar. El carcinoma intraductal de la próstata (CIDP) es una entidad histológica distinta que se cree que representa la propagación retrógrada del adenocarcinoma acinar invasivo en los conductos prostáticos y acinos.Hemos analizado el impacto del CIDP en pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración metastásico (CPRCm) y sin tratamiento hormonal previo (hormone-naïve).Pacientes y métodosEvaluamos retrospectivamente a 118 pacientes con CPRCm con diagnóstico inicial de cáncer de prostata metastásico (CPM) desde mayo del 2010 hasta septiembre del 2018. El grupo uno incluyó 81 personas con CPM con adenocarcinoma acinar y el grupo dos estuvo compuesto por 37 pacientes con CPM con CIDP.ResultadosLa edad media de presentación fue de 76 años (IQR 73,4 a 78,7) en el grupo uno y de 74 años (68,5 a 80,6) en el grupo dos. El valor medio del PSA en el momento del diagnóstico fue de 619 ng/mL (IQR 85 a 1.113) y 868 ng/mL (IQR 186 a 1.922), respectivamente. El tiempo hasta la resistencia a la castración fue de 24,7 meses (IQR 16,7 a 32,7) en el grupo uno y 10,2 meses (IQR 4,2 a 16,2) en el grupo dos (p = 0,007). El tiempo hasta la progresión en los pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración (CPRC) fue: 10,6 meses (IQR 5,6 a 15,6) y 6,2 meses (3,2 a 9,2), respectivamente (p = 0,05). La supervivencia global fue de 57,9 meses en el grupo uno (IC 95% 56,4 a 59,5) y de 38 meses (IC 95% 19,9 a 48,06) en el grupo dos (p = 0,001). En el análisis multivariante, el subtipo de adenocarcinoma fue estadísticamente significativo p 0,014, IC 95% (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0,058, 0,006 a 0,56).ConclusionesEl CIDP parece ser un subtipo de CP que se asocia con una respuesta más corta al tratamiento hormonal cuando se compara con el adenocarcinoma acinar en pacientes con cáncer metastásico. (AU)

Introduction and objective: Most prostate cancers are classified as acinar adenocarcinoma. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is a distinct histologic entity that is believed to represent retrograde spread of invasive acinar adenocarcinoma into prostatic ducts and acini.We have analyzed the impact of IDC-P in hormonal naïve and castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer patients.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 118 metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who were initially diagnosed with distant metastases from May 2010 to September 2018. Group 1 patients included 81 metastatic PCa patients with acinar adenocarcinoma and Group 2 included 37 metastatic PCa patients with IDC-P.ResultsMean age at presentation was 76 years (IQR 73.4-78.7) in group 1 and 74 years (68.5-80.6) in group 2. Mean PSA at diagnosis was 619 ng/mL (IQR 85-1113) and 868 ng/mL (IQR 186-1922), respectively. Time to castration resistance was 24.7 months (IQR 16.7-32.7) in group 1 and 10.2 months (IQR 4.2-16.2) in group 2 (p = 0.007). Time to progression in CPRC patients was: 10.6 months (IQR 5.6-15.6) and at 6.2 months (3.2-9.2), respectively (p = 0.05). Overall survival was 57.9 months in group 1(CI 95% 56.4-59.5) and 38 months (CI 95% 19.9-48.06) in group 2 (p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma subtype was statistically significant p 0.014, CI 95% (HR 0.058, 0.006-0.56).ConclusionsIDC-P seems to be a subtype of prostate cancer that is associated with a shorter response to hormonal treatment when compared to acinar adenocarcinoma in metastatic patients. New drugs in CRPC scenario as abiraterone and enzalutamide also obtained less response in IDC-P patients. In daily clinical practice it might be interesting to take into account that patients with IDC-P may present shorter responses to first and second line hormonal treatments. (AU)

Concomitant intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and response to hormonal therapy in metastatic prostate carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Most prostate cancers are classified as acinar adenocarcinoma. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is a distinct histologic entity that is believed to represent retrograde spread of invasive acinar adenocarcinoma into prostatic ducts and acini. We have analyzed the impact of IDC-P in hormonal naïve and castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 118 metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who were initially diagnosed with distant metastases from May 2010 to September 2018. Group 1 patients included 81 metastatic PCa patients with acinar adenocarcinoma and Group 2 included 37 metastatic PCa patients with IDC-P. RESULTS: Mean age at presentation was 76 years (IQR 73.4-78.7) in group 1 and 74 years (68.5-80.6) in group 2. Mean PSA at diagnosis was 619 ng/mL (IQR 85-1113) and 868 ng/mL (IQR 186-1922), respectively. Time to castration resistance was 24.7 months (IQR 16.7-32.7) in group 1 and 10.2 months (IQR 4.2-16.2) in group 2 (P = .007). Time to progression in CPRC patients was: 10.6 months (IQR 5.6-15.6) and at 6.2 months (3.2-9.2), respectively (P = .05). Overall survival was 57.9 months in group 1(CI 95% 56.4-59.5) and 38 months (CI 95% 19.9-48.06) in group 2 (P = .001). In the multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma subtype was statistically significant P .014, CI 95% (HR 0.058, 0.006-0.56) CONCLUSIONS: IDC-P seems to be a subtype of prostate cancer that is associated with a shorter response to hormonal treatment when compared to acinar adenocarcinoma in metastatic patients. New drugs in CRPC scenario as abiraterone and enzalutamide also obtained less response in IDC-P patients. Once IDC-P is identified, clinicians could extrapolate the relative poor response to hormonal therapy. Consequently, follow-up of these patients in this scenario should be more strict.

Adherence to prophylaxis and quality of life in children and adolescents with severe haemophilia A.

Treatment adherence in adolescents with chronic diseases is around 50%, and failure is more common in preventive therapy. In haemophilia, contradictory results are reported by the published studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate adherence with factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis in Spanish patients with severe haemophilia A between age 6 and 20 years. Data were collected retrosp-ectively in the previous 2 years. The primary endpoint was the absolute adherence index (AAI), and the endpoints were related to clinical status, age, prophylaxis regimen, responsibility for factor administration and quality of life (QoL), assessed by the Haemo-QoL questionnaires. A total of 78 patients from 14 Spanish hospitals were recruited. Adherence ranged between -64.4 and 66.7 (mean -3.08). No differences were observed between children and adolescents (7.11 vs. 6.39; P = 0.809). A statistically significant association (P < 0.010) between infra adherent group and target joint was found, as was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.010) between the number of bleeding episodes experienced by the adherent group (mean 1.4) and by infra adherents (mean 4.5). There was no significant difference between AAI and prophylactic regimen (6.35 vs. 6.96, P = 0.848), neither between AAI and the person responsible for factor administration (5.57 vs. 8.79, P = 0.326). The Haemo-QoL scores (8-12 years) were related to adherence level (P < 0.05). Adherence was approximately ideal and patients perceived a high QoL. Because of the repercussions for compliance, it is essential to work during puberty on emotional and self-acceptance aspects of the disease, as well as coping, and the patient's family, school and health team relationships.

Rapid triplex asymmetric real-time PCR hybridization probe assay for the joint genotyping of F2, F5 and F12.

INTRODUCTION: The Factor 5 Leiden mutation and the G20210A variant of Factor 2 are two important risk factors for hereditary thromboembolism. Several reports have demonstrated that homozygous carriers for C46T mutation of the Factor 12 gene is associated with a significant increased risk for the development of coronary disease as well as cerebral and peripheral venous thrombosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: We develop a rapid and feasible asymmetric multiplex real-time PCR-based method using fluorescence resonance emission transfer (FRET) probes followed by a melting temperature (T(m)) curve assay for the simultaneous clinical diagnosis of F2, F5 and F12 mutations in a 10 microl closed tube. This new tool uses three different fluorescence channels in a LightCycler 2.0 for the robust genotyping of each one of the mutations included in the reaction. RESULTS: Assay evaluation performed on 67 DNA samples previously genotyped with reference methods resulted in full concordance of results for the three mutations tested. Higher asymmetric ratio of primer pair concentration significantly increased the efficiency of the melting peak assay used for the mutation genotyping without modifying the Crossing Point (CP) obtained from the amplification curves. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first triplex real-time PCR FRET-based assay reported in bibliography that allows a rapid and simultaneous genotyping of these three thrombosis risk factors. This new and rapid tool may contribute to the better understanding of the interrelations or contributions of these gene mutations to different thrombotic or coronary disease-related events.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatinum: an effective regimen in a patient with progressive refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

We report here a 68-year-old man with progressive refractory Mantle cell Lymphoma stage IV-A, treated with different chemotherapeutic drugs. With no therapeutic options we decided to treat him with oxaliplatinum-gemcitabine regimen, based on the proven efficacy and synergy of these drugs in other tumors and lymphomas. Treatment was well tolerated and patient achieved a maintained complete remission with 6 months of follow up. We consider that this may be a salvage therapeutic option for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.